Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 165
Filtrar
1.
Neurol Clin ; 42(2): 341-373, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575256

RESUMO

Posttraumatic headaches are one of the most common and controversial secondary headache types. After a mild traumatic brain, an estimated 11% to 82% of people develop a postconcussion syndrome, which has been controversial for more than 160 years. Headache is estimated as present in 30% to 90% of patients after a mild head injury. Most headaches are tension-type-like or migraine-like. Headaches in civilians, soldiers, athletes, and postcraniotomy are reviewed. The treatments are the same as for the primary headaches. Persistent posttraumatic headaches can continue for many years.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Militares , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Atletas , Concussão Encefálica/complicações
2.
Neurol Clin ; 42(2): 543-557, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575265

RESUMO

Cervicogenic headaches are a secondary headache disorder attributable to cervical spine dysfunction resulting in head pain with or without neck pain. Diagnosis of this condition has been complicated by varied clinical presentations, causations, and differing diagnostic criteria. In this article, we aim to clarify the approach to diagnosing cervicogenic headaches by providing an overview of cervicogenic headaches, clinical case examples, and a practical diagnostic algorithm based on the most current criteria. A standardized approach will aid in confirmation of the diagnosis of cervicogenic headaches and facilitate further research into this condition.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Cefaleia/terapia , Cervicalgia/complicações , Vértebras Cervicais
3.
Curr Opin Neurol ; 37(3): 264-270, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38294020

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Posttraumatic headache (PTH), a headache that develops within 7 days of a causative injury, is one of the most common secondary headaches, mostly attributed to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Because presence of preinjury headache is a risk factor for developing PTH and PTH symptoms often resemble migraine or tension-type headache, the association between PTH and primary headaches has attracted attention from clinicians and scientists. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies on epidemiological aspects, headache features, risk factors, imaging characteristics, and response to treatment, suggest overlapping features and distinct objective findings in PTH compared to migraine. SUMMARY: We argue that PTH is distinct from migraine. Therefore, PTH epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis should continue to be investigated separately from migraine.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/complicações , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/fisiopatologia
4.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev ; 156: 105498, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38043751

RESUMO

Post-traumatic headache (PTH) represents the most common acute and persistent symptom following concussion in children, yet the underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. This systematic review sought to: (i) rigorously examine the current evidence of PTH pathophysiology in paediatric concussion (0-18 years), (ii) assess the quality of evidence, and (iii) provide directions for future research in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies (n = 19) totalling 1214 concussion participants investigated cerebrovascular function (n = 6), white matter integrity (n = 3), functional connectivity (n = 3), electrophysiology (n = 1), neurometabolics (n = 2), biological fluid markers (n = 4), vestibular and oculomotor function (n = 4); two studies used a multi-modal approach. Majority of studies were rated as fair quality (90%) and Level 3 evidence (84%). The true underlying mechanisms of PTH following paediatric concussion remain unclear. Overall quality of the available evidence is generally weak with a fair risk of bias and characterised by relative scarcity and lack of specificity of PTH pathophysiology. Future research is required to rigorously isolate pathophysiology specific to PTH with strict adherence to clinical definitions and standardised measurement tools of PTH.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Humanos , Criança , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico
5.
Brain ; 147(4): 1312-1320, 2024 Apr 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864847

RESUMO

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38), known for its role in migraine pathogenesis, has been identified as a novel drug target. Given the clinical parallels between post-traumatic headache (PTH) and migraine, we explored the possible role of PACAP-38 in the pathogenesis of PTH. To this end, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial involving adult participants diagnosed with persistent PTH resulting from mild traumatic brain injury. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 20-min continuous intravenous infusion of either PACAP-38 (10 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (isotonic saline) on two separate experimental days, with a 1-week washout period in between. The primary outcome was the difference in incidence of migraine-like headache between PACAP-38 and placebo during a 12-h observational period post-infusion. The secondary outcome was the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) for baseline-corrected median headache intensity scores during the same 12-h observational period. Of 49 individuals assessed for eligibility, 21 were enrolled and completed the trial. The participants had a mean age of 35.2 years, and 16 (76%) were female. Most [19 of 21 (90%)] had a migraine-like phenotype. During the 12-h observational period, 20 of 21 (95%) participants developed migraine-like headache after intravenous infusion of PACAP-38, compared with two (10%) participants after placebo (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the baseline-corrected AUC values for median headache intensity scores during the 12-h observational period was higher after PACAP-38 than placebo (P < 0.001). These compelling results demonstrate that PACAP-38 is potent inducer of migraine-like headache in people with persistent PTH. Thus, targeting PACAP-38 signalling might be a promising avenue for the treatment of PTH.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/tratamento farmacológico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Polipeptídeo Hipofisário Ativador de Adenilato Ciclase/uso terapêutico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Cefaleia/complicações , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/complicações , Método Duplo-Cego
6.
Headache ; 63(9): 1240-1250, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796114

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the utility of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and nerve growth factor (NGF) as potential biomarkers for headache and pain disorders in the post-military deployment setting. BACKGROUND: The need to improve recognition, assessment, and prognoses of individuals with posttraumatic headache or other pain has increased interest in the potential of CGRP and NGF as biomarkers. METHODS: The Warrior Strong Study (NCT01847040) is an observational longitudinal study of United States-based soldiers who had recently returned from deployment to Afghanistan or Iraq from 2009 to 2014. The present nested cross-sectional analysis uses baseline data collected from soldiers returning to Fort Bragg, North Carolina. RESULTS: In total, 264 soldiers (mean (standard deviation [SD] age 28.1 [6.4] years, 230/264 [87.1%] men, 171/263 [65.0%] White) were analyzed. Mean (SD) plasma levels of CGRP were 1.3 (1.1) pg/mL and mean levels of NGF were 1.4 (0.4) pg/mL. Age was negatively correlated with NGF (-0.01 pg/mL per year, p = 0.007) but was not associated with CGRP. Men had higher mean (SD) CGRP plasma levels than women (1.4 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.2] vs. 0.9 95% CI [0.5] pg/mL, p < 0.002, Kruskal-Wallis test). CGRP levels were lower in participants who had a headache at the time of the blood draw (1.0 [0.6] pg/mL vs. 1.4 [1.2] pg/mL, p = 0.024). NGF was lower in participants with continuous pain (all types; 1.2 [0.4] vs. 1.4 [0.4] pg/mL, p = 0.027) and was lower in participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI) + posttraumatic headache (PTH) versus TBI without PTH (1.3 [0.3] vs. 1.4 [0.4] pg/mL, p = 0.021). Otherwise, CGRP and NGF were not associated with migraine-like headache, TBI status, or headache burden as measured by the number of medical encounters in crude or adjusted models. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, plasma levels of NGF and CGRP showed promise as biomarkers for headache and other types of pain. These findings need to be replicated in other cohorts.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Militares , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos Transversais , Fator de Crescimento Neural , Cefaleia/complicações , Dor/complicações , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Biomarcadores
7.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 66: 102787, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301672

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cervicogenic headache, first proposed as a distinct headache in 1983, is a secondary headache to a primary cervical musculoskeletal disorder. Research into physical impairments was integral to clinical diagnosis and to develop and test research informed conservative management as the first line approach. PURPOSE: This narrative presents an overview of the body of cervicogenic headache research from our laboratory which was undertaken in the context of a broad program of research into neck pain disorders. IMPLICATIONS: Early research validated manual examination of the upper cervical segments against anaesthetic nerve blocks, which was vital to clinical diagnosis of cervicogenic headache. Further studies identified reduced cervical motion, altered motor control of the neck flexors, reduced strength of flexor and extensor muscles, and occasional presentation of mechanosensitivity of the upper cervical dura. Single measures are variable and not reliable in diagnosis. We proved that a pattern of reduced motion, upper cervical joint signs and impaired deep neck flexor function accurately identified cervicogenic headache and differentiated it from migraine and tension-type headache. The pattern was validated against placebo controlled diagnostic nerve blocks. A large multicentre clinical trial determined that a combined program of manipulative therapy and motor control exercise is effective in the management of cervicogenic headache and outcomes are maintained in the long term. More specific research into cervical related sensorimotor controlled is warranted in cervicogenic headache. Further adequately powered clinical trials of current research informed multimodal programs are advocated to further strengthen the evidence base for conservative management of cervicogenic headache.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional , Humanos , Cefaleia/terapia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia
8.
Pain ; 164(12): 2627-2641, 2023 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37390366

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: The most recent prevalence estimate of post-traumatic headache (PTH) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in veterans and civilians dates back to 2008. The prevalence was found to be 57.8%, with surprising higher rates (75.3%) in mild TBI when compared with those with moderate/severe TBI (32.1%). However, the revision of mild TBI diagnostic criteria and an historic peak of TBI in the elderly individuals attributed to the ageing population may lead to different results. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the updated prevalence of PTH during the past 14 years only in civilians. A literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines guided by a librarian. Screening, full-text assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed blindly by 2 raters. Meta-analysis of proportions using the Freeman and Tukey double arcsine method of transformation was conducted. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regressions were performed with the predictors: year of publication, mean age, sex, TBI severity, and study design. Sixteen studies were selected for the qualitative analysis and 10 for the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence estimate of PTH was 47.1%, (confidence interval = 34.6, 59.8, prediction intervals = 10.8, 85.4), being similar at different time points (3, 6, 12, and 36+ months). Heterogeneity was high, and none of the meta-regressions were significant. The overall prevalence of PTH after TBI over the past 14 years remains high even if assessed only in civilians. However, the prevalence rates attributed to mild and moderate/severe TBI were similar, differing significantly from previous reports. Efforts are needed to improve TBI outcomes.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Prevalência , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia
9.
Headache ; 63(1): 136-145, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36651586

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common symptom after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Although there have been several studies that have used clinical features of PTH to attempt to predict headache recovery, currently no accurate methods exist for predicting individuals' improvement from acute PTH. This study investigated the utility of clinical questionnaires for predicting (i) headache improvement at 3 and 6 months, and (ii) headache trajectories over the first 3 months. METHODS: We conducted a clinic-based observational longitudinal study of patients with acute PTH who completed a battery of clinical questionnaires within 0-59 days post-mTBI. The battery included headache history, symptom evaluation, cognitive tests, psychological tests, and scales assessing photosensitivity, hyperacusis, insomnia, cutaneous allodynia, and substance use. Each participant completed a web-based headache diary, which was used to determine headache improvement. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants with acute PTH (mean age = 42.7, standard deviation [SD] = 12.0; 25 females/12 males) completed questionnaires at an average of 21.7 (SD = 13.1) days post-mTBI. The classification of headache improvement or non-improvement at 3 and 6 months achieved cross-validation area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55 to 0.89) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.00). Sub-models trained using only the top five features still achieved 0.72 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.90) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.00) AUC. The top five contributing features were from three questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale total score and helplessness sub-domain score; Sports Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Evaluation total score and number of symptoms; and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score. The functional regression model achieved R = 0.64 for modeling headache trajectory over the first 3 months. CONCLUSION: Questionnaires completed following mTBI have good utility for predicting headache improvement at 3 and 6 months in the future as well as the evolving headache trajectory. Reducing the battery to only three questionnaires, which assess post-concussive symptom load and biopsychosocialecologic factors, was helpful to determine a reasonable prediction accuracy for headache improvement.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Síndrome Pós-Concussão , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Adulto , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Estudos Longitudinais , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/etiologia , Síndrome Pós-Concussão/psicologia
10.
J Man Manip Ther ; 31(3): 198-205, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35844199

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The relative value of clinical tests toward identifying cervicogenic headache (CGH) remains under investigated. Whilst certain physical examination findings have been associated with CGH, consensus on which findings provide the strongest association remains elusive. OBJECTIVES: To determine which cervical musculoskeletal assessment procedures used in CGH are positively associated with CGH. DESIGN: Single blind observational study. METHODS: Four selected musculoskeletal assessment procedures of the cervical spine, craniocervical flexion test, cervical flexion-rotation test, cervical retraction range of motion and reproduction and resolution of familiar head pain with upper cervical spine sustained joint mobilization, were applied to 20 headache and 20 controls. Inclusion criteria for the headache group met the International Headache Society criteria for CGH except positive diagnostic blocks. RESULTS: Upper cervical spine sustained joint mobilization testing associated with reproduction and resolution of familiar head pain was strongly associated with CGH (Odds Ratio = 36, p < 0.01). This was 78% sensitive and 90% specific in identifying CGH. Other physical tests were not statistically associated with CGH. CONCLUSIONS: Reproduction and resolution of familiar head pain with upper cervical spine sustained joint mobilization is effective in differentiating those with CGH from control participants. Other cervical measures did not clearly identify CGH in this study.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Método Simples-Cego , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Vértebras Cervicais , Reprodução
11.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract ; 62: 102640, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36088782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cervicogenic headache (CGH) remains a challenge for clinicians as the diagnostic value of detailed history and clinical findings remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To update and evaluate available evidence of the prevalence and the diagnostic accuracy of the detailed history and clinical findings for CGH in adults with headache. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Embase, PEDro and PubMed were searched for studies before March 2022 that reported detailed history and/or clinical findings related to the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache. Study selection, risk of bias assessment (QUADAS-2 and PROBAST), and data extraction were performed. Meta-analyses for the cervical flexion-rotation test (CFRT) was performed. Certainty of the evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Moderate certainty evidence indicated that the CFRT differentiated CGH from lower cervical facet-induced headache, migraine, concomitant headaches or asymptomatic subjects (Se 83.0% [95%CI:70.0%-92.0%]; Sp 83.0% [95%CI:71.0%-91.0%]; positive LR 5.0 [95%CI:2.6-9.5]; negative LR 0.2 [95%CI:0.1-0.4]; n = 4 studies; n = 182 participants). Several diagnostic classifications and test clusters based on headache history and clinical findings can be useful, despite uncertain accuracy, in formulating the diagnosis of CGH. CONCLUSION: Evidence support to undertake an evaluation of headache history and signs and symptoms and a physical examination of the patient neck to diagnose CGH. During the physical examination, a positive or negative CFRT probably has a small to moderate effect on the probability of a patient having a CGH. The diagnostic value of the other findings remains unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: #CRD42020201772.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Adulto , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Exame Físico , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
12.
Semin Neurol ; 42(4): 428-440, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36041477

RESUMO

Posttraumatic headache (PTH) is the most common secondary headache disorder, accounting for approximately 4% of all headache disorders. It is the most common symptom following concussion (mild traumatic brain injury) and can be debilitating for many who have persistent symptoms. With a recent increase in public awareness regarding traumatic brain injury, there has been a corresponding increase in PTH research. The pathophysiology of PTH remains poorly understood and the underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial. Diagnosis of PTH is dependent on a temporal relationship to a head injury. PTH often resembles common primary headache phenotypes. Treatment of PTH utilizes known treatments for these other headache phenotypes, as there is no currently approved treatment specifically for PTH. Moving forward, further studies are needed to better define and validate the definition of PTH, understand the underlying pathophysiology, and find more specific treatments.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Cefaleia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações
13.
Cephalalgia ; 42(11-12): 1172-1183, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35546269

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited prospective data on the prevalence, timing of onset, and characteristics of acute headache following concussion/mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with concussion (arising from injuries not related to work or motor vehicle accidents) were recruited from emergency departments and seen within one week post injury wherein they completed questionnaires assessing demographic variables, pre-injury headache history, post-injury headache history, and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT-3) symptom checklist, the Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire (SCQ) and mood/anxiety on the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). RESULTS: A total of 302 participants (59% female) were enrolled (mean age 33.6 years) and almost all (92%) endorsed post-traumatic headache (PTH) with 94% endorsing headache onset within 24 hours of injury. Headache location was not correlated with site of injury. Most participants (84%) experienced daily headache. Headache quality was pressure/squeezing in 69% and throbbing/pulsing type in 22%. Associated symptoms included: photophobia (74%), phonophobia (72%) and nausea (55%). SCAT-3 symptom scores, Brief Symptom Inventory and Sleep and Concussion Questionnaire scores were significantly higher in those endorsing acute PTH. No significant differences were found in week 1 acute PTH by sex, history of migraine, pre-injury headache frequency, anxiety, or depression, nor presence/absence of post-traumatic amnesia and self-reported loss of consciousness. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the very high incidence of acute PTH following concussion, the timing of onset and characteristics of acute PTH, the associated psychological and sleep disturbances and notes that the current ICHD-3 criteria for headaches attributed to mild traumatic injury to the head are reasonable, the interval between injury and headache onset should not be extended beyond seven days and could, potentially, be shorted to allow for greater diagnostic precision.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Adulto , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Feminino , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos
14.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 26(7): 555-566, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35567660

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are notable health disparities and inequities in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and concussion by race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, and geography. This review will evaluate these disparities and inequities and assess the social determinants of health that drive outcomes for post-traumatic headache. Interventions for achieving this are also discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant disparities and inequities exist in TBI and concussion among people of different races, socioeconomic status, and geographic locations. Migraine is a common symptom post-concussion, for which disparities and social determinants of health are also discussed. Overall, multi-level interventions to reduce these disparities and inequities are reviewed for post-traumatic headache but require further investigation. Interventions are needed to reduce disparities and inequities including public health initiatives, improvements in clinical care, diversity/inclusion training, and research efforts. As literature expands, we can form guidance to identify solutions for eliminating disparities in care of diverse populations.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia
15.
Headache ; 62(3): 241-270, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35315066

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence regarding static and dynamic balance alterations among patients with headache. METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched by two researchers independently up to September 2021. Two reviewers selected eligible studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Downs and Black checklist. Case-control studies were included if they involved balance assessment of any kind of headache, including objective outcome measures of dynamic and static tests such as body sway displacement, limits of stability (LOS), gait, and tandem walk tests. A meta-analysis and post hoc sensitivity analyses were performed when possible. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (1202 patients with headache and 597 controls) were included in this review and 16 of them in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate among all studies. Greater sway area in static posturography was shown by patients with migraine in comparison to controls, with more consistent differences in more challenging test conditions, such as over a foam surface with eyes closed (difference of 4.8 cm2 , 95% CI: 3.8-5.9). Lower performance of patients with migraine during the tandem walk test (difference of -7.8 cm/s, 95% CI: -9.0 to -6.5) and slower reaction time in the LOS test (difference of 0.3 s, 95% CI: 0.2-0.4) were also verified. There is no evidence of altered sway velocity and length in static posturography among patients with migraine (p > 0.05). The level of evidence is very low for balance alteration of any kind among patients with tension-type and cervicogenic headache owing to the limited number of studies and high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: This review confirmed the presence of static and dynamic balance alterations among patients with migraine. Future studies with low risk of bias are needed to decrease heterogeneity in methodology and explore the role of subdiagnosis on the balance of patients with headache.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cefaleia , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Equilíbrio Postural
16.
J Headache Pain ; 23(1): 27, 2022 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35183101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common symptom following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Patients at risk to develop acute PTH (aPTH) and further persistent PTH (pPTH) need to be recognized. METHODS: This is a one-year follow-up of 127 patients with mTBI, aged 18 to 68, referred to outpatient clinic in the Helsinki University Hospital. Symptoms were assessed at the emergency department (ED), with structured interview at outpatient clinic visit and with Rivermead post-concussion symptom questionnaire at one, three, and 12 months after injury. Psychiatric disorders were assessed with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders at 3-4 months and return to work (RTW) from patient records. RESULTS: At one month, 77/127 patients (61%) had aPTH. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, risk factors for aPTH were headache at the emergency department (ED) (OR 5.43), other pain (OR 3.19), insomnia (OR 3.23), and vertigo (OR 5.98). At three months, 17 patients (22% of aPTH patients) had developed pPTH, and at one year, 4 patients (24% of pPTH patients) still presented with pPTH. Risk factors for pPTH at three months were older age (OR 1.06) and current insomnia (OR 12.3). The frequency of psychiatric disorders did not differ between the groups. pPTH patients performed worse on their RTW. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for aPTH were insomnia, headache at ED, other pain, and vertigo and for pPTH, insomnia and older age. RTW rate was lower among pPTH patients.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Concussão Encefálica/complicações , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Retorno ao Trabalho , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Man Manip Ther ; 30(2): 78-95, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34269160

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine if thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) improves pain and disability in individuals with cervicogenic headache (CeH). METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover trial was conducted on 48 participants (mean age: 34.4 years) with CeH symptoms. Participants were randomized to 6 sessions of TSM or no treatment (Hold) and after 4-weeks, groups crossed over. Outcomes were collected at 4, 8 and 12 weeks and included: headache disability inventory (HDI), neck disability index (NDI), and the global rating of change (GRC). Outcomes were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with Bonferroni correction. Odds of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the GRC of +4 or greater were also calculated. Scores at 4 weeks represent the only timepoint where 1 group is fully treated and other group has not received any treatment. RESULTS: Comparing hold to active treatment, HDI were not significantly different between groups (mean difference = 7.39, 95 CI: -4.39 to 19.18; P = 0.214) at any timepoint; the NDI was significant (mean difference = 6.90, 95 CI: 0.05 to 13.75; P = 0.048) at 4 weeks. Odds of achieving the +4 MCID on the GRC (OR = 38.0, 95 CI: 6.6 to 220.0; p < 0.001) favored TSM at 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: TSM had no effect on headache-related disability but resulted in significant improvements in neck-related disability and participant reported perceived improvement. Future studies are needed to examine the long-term impact of TSM in this population.


Assuntos
Manipulação da Coluna , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Humanos , Manipulação da Coluna/métodos , Cervicalgia/terapia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia , Coluna Vertebral
18.
Pain Med ; 23(6): 1059-1065, 2022 05 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484154

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to assess the utility of controlled diagnostic blocks in patients with probable cervicogenic headache by determining the prevalence of sources of pain among the upper and lower synovial joints of the cervical spine. METHODS: Controlled diagnostic blocks were performed in 166 consecutive patients who clinically exhibited features consistent with a diagnosis of probable cervicogenic headache. Data were collected on how often a particular source of pain could be pinpointed and how often particular diagnostic blocks provided a positive yield. RESULTS: In patients in whom headache was the dominant complaint, diagnostic blocks succeeded in establishing the source of pain in 75% of patients. The C2-3 joint was the source of pain in 62%, followed by the C1-2 (7%) and C3-4 (6%). In patients in whom headache was less severe than neck pain, blocks were successful in 67%. C2-3 was the source of pain in 42%, followed by lower cervical joints in 18% and the C3-4 joint in 7%. CONCLUSIONS: Controlled diagnostic blocks can establish the source of pain in the majority of patients presenting with probable cervicogenic headache, with C2-3 being the most common source. On the basis of pretest probability, diagnostic algorithms should commence investigations at C2-3. Second and third steps in the algorithm should differ according to whether headache is the dominant or nondominant complaint.


Assuntos
Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Vértebras Cervicais , Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Cervicalgia/diagnóstico , Cervicalgia/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia
20.
Semin Pediatr Neurol ; 40: 100935, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34749911

RESUMO

Post-traumatic headache is a secondary headache disorder beginning within 7 days of head injury. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for treatment of post-traumatic headache in children. Of 2169 unique articles screened, 12 were included. Most studies pertained to headaches after concussion. The authors of seven studies examined the effect of medications, 4 studied nonpharmacological therapies, and 1 studied the reduction of medication usage. Much of the evidence came from retrospective chart reviews, had low level of evidence, and had fair risk of bias. High-quality randomized controlled treatment trials are needed to guide the clinical management of this condition.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática , Criança , Cefaleia , Humanos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/etiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA